2010/10/11 Amsterdam
Nicknames
The base
This article by James Risen that was published in the Times on Friday deserves your attention:
‘Afghan private security forces with ties to the Taliban, criminal networks and Iranian intelligence have been hired to guard American military bases in Afghanistan, exposing United States soldiers to surprise attack and confounding the fight against insurgents, according to a Senate investigation.
The Pentagon’s oversight of the Afghan guards is virtually nonexistent, allowing local security deals among American military commanders, Western contracting companies and Afghan warlords who are closely connected to the violent insurgency, according to the report by investigators on the staff of the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The United States military has almost no independent information on the Afghans guarding the bases, who are employees of Afghan groups hired as subcontractors by Western firms awarded security contracts by the Pentagon. At one large American airbase in western Afghanistan, military personnel did not even know the names of the leaders of the Afghan groups providing base security, the investigators found. So they used the nicknames that the contractor was using — Mr. White and Mr. Pink from “Reservoir Dogs,” the 1992 gangster movie by Quentin Tarantino. Mr. Pink was later determined to be a “known Taliban” figure, they reported.’
I hope that somewhere in the US military a contemporary Joseph Heller is working on a novel.
9 comments
Arnon
How did your 'performance' at your godson's school go? Did they like your story?
I think the Taliban leader called Mr. Pink exploded himself and his namegivers out of rage when he found out about his nickname. Like in the movie Reservoir Dogs in life a lot of male (war)criminals dont want to be associated with this colour.
Privatisation is the main belief nowadays, so the state and their employees (even the regular soldiers) become the real enemy not to be trusted.
The social contract has become a contract between the war lords of powerful private companies and their unlimited human resources, reduced to the status of mercenaries. (to paraphrase the words of the late Tony Judt)
to: Bernard
As Arnon already suggested: this sounds a lot like Catch-22, the great novel by Joseph Heller about (bureaucratic) crazyness in the mediteranean theater in World War II.
Not much privatisation in those days.
Peter
Do you REALLY believe this has to do with bureaucracy ?
@Peter Smeets
My comment has nothing to do with a real catch 22 situation. More with absurdity, neo liberal style, in a war zone. (I am familiar with absurdity, communist style, too.)
bureaucrazy
Of course there are other factors to consider but don't underestimate the value of a good bureaucracy when it comes to power (expanding your power, staying in power).
But, as far as I know, large powers/bureaucracies always create a certain amount of internal chaos. And that chaos leads to catch-22 situations, be it in 1943 or in 2010 (or whenever).
Maybe create isn't the right word. Inherent is a better expression.
Peter
Sounds reasonable as arguments. Well, i don't know about this situation, but bureaucracy looks so far away in this too me, that's all. We have to watch out not to use it as an excuse maybe...
@Milan van Opmeer
"watch out"
Good grief....