2007/08/08 Murnau
Accountability Office
Criminals
Yesterday in the Intenational Herald Tribune:
‘The Pentagon cannot account for 190,000 AK-47 rifles and pistols given to Iraqi security forces in 2004 and 2005, or about half the weapons earmarked for soldiers and police officers, according to a government report.
The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, said in a July 31 report to lawmakers that the Defense Department also could not account for 135,000 pieces of body armor and 115,000 helmets reported to have been issued to Iraqi forces as of Sept. 22, 2005.
The congressional office said the Pentagon concurred with its findings and had begun a review to ensure full accountability for the program to train and equip Iraqi forces.
"Our review of the 2007 property books found continuing problems with missing and incomplete records," the report said.
The report raised concerns that weapons provided by the United States could be falling into the hands of insurgents and criminals. A senior Pentagon official told The Washington Post that some of the weapons probably were being used against American troops.’
How exactly do they know that these weapons cannot be accounted for?
Maybe Iraqi soldiers are selling their weapons to make a living? Sort of.
9 comments
If my memory is correct, selling their arms was a way of living for the underpaid and unmotivated South Vietnamese soldiers up to 1975 too. Same old story, I am afraid. (AK 47 provided by the USA ? These are the originals weapons of the Iraqi forces, I think - see -
http://kalashnikov.guns.ru/)
Remarkable news yesterday in the newspapers: Adolf Hitler shedding a tear listening to his favourite Russian music played by Jewish musicians…
(As we all know now, the traitorous enemy is lurking inside - or was he simply an undercover ‘artiste paintre’?)
Anna
Dear Anna, i do not know you.
Friede
Ah, good. You're still there. I was wondering why you were not around for so long.
But you are easily aroused.
A few years ago I was offered a new computer (still in it's box) for 200 euro, property of the belgian army. I felt tempted , but I refused the offer. I doubt it was because of their small income those soldiers were selling stolen goods.
In Belgium a lot of people have mixed feelings towards the national institutions, mocking the monarchy is a national sport. The other national institute, the belgian army, isn't extremely popular too. Stealing from it isn't considered a real crime.
@Mieke Dutoit
I do not speak for the Belgian Army neither for their income, but I shall never forget the words of a commanding officer (after a few drinks). He said: “Stealing only becomes a problem when it is no longer limited to higher officers. When common agents start stealing, we are finished”. It sounds unfair but he has a point, I am afraid, that is how a hierarchic system works.
@ Jan
Then I guess the belgian army is finished.
Or the american army in Iraq for that matter.
Jan Thys
The commanding officer was of course right -- at least he was being realistic and practical.