[ Previous ]   [ Next ]

Secret fame

Satisfaction

I cannot say that I’m a heavy user of Wikipedia, but nevertheless as most people I use it from time to time as I use public bathrooms from time to time. Wikipedia of course is public, but by no means a bathroom.
This insightful article by Nicholson Baker in The New York Review of Books reveals, among other things, who are the contributors of Wikipedia.
As Baker puts it: ‘Very smart people dropped other pursuits and spent days and weeks and sometimes years of their lives doing "stub dumps", writing ancillary software, categorizing and linking topics, making and remaking and smoothing out articles—without getting any recognition except for the occasional congratulatory barnstar on their user page and the satisfaction of secret fame.’ All fame should be secret. We don’t need Wikipedia for this lesson, but still it would help us a lot.


5 comments Last_comment
I use it as a quick reference guide (So I learn that ‘bathroom’ in the USA, is not a place to take a bath)
Jan
When I first went to the United States, I thought restrooms were for taking a rest.
Jan T
A bathroom can be both: a room containing a bath and/or a room containing a toilet.
@Arnon
‘Der herr Karl’, although for me very difficult to understand, I think it is so realistic that it hurts.
‘HELMUT QUALTINGER LIESST ADOLF’ is my favorite ( a real Adolf!).
this is eerie--first, I added a few words to your (arnon's) Dutch wikipedia entry on Sunday and now you write about, and second, Nicholson Baker's article quotes 'Diogenes of Sinope' as an example of what you can look up--I was on that page just 15 minutes ago.